Use new GitHub preview terms in working-with-us.md
Update the "working with us" docs to align with new GitHub previews terminology, replacing `beta` with `public preview`. https://github.blog/changelog/2024-10-18-new-terminology-for-github-previews/
This commit is contained in:
parent
34f1b50acc
commit
abb2772696
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -25,13 +25,13 @@ Describe how your new command would be used. Include mock-up examples, including
|
|||
|
||||
We take this step seriously because we believe in keeping `gh`'s interface consistent and intuitive.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 2: Beta
|
||||
## Step 2: Public Preview
|
||||
|
||||
Once we've signed off on the proposed UX on the issue opened in step 1, develop your extension to at least beta quality. It's up to you if you actually want to go through a beta release phase with real users or not.
|
||||
Once we've signed off on the proposed UX on the issue opened in step 1, develop your extension to at least public preview quality. It's up to you if you actually want to go through a public preview release phase with real users or not.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 3: Merge or no merge
|
||||
|
||||
With a beta in hand it's time to decide whether or not to mainline your extension into the `trunk` of `gh`. Some questions to consider:
|
||||
With a public preview in hand it's time to decide whether or not to mainline your extension into the `trunk` of `gh`. Some questions to consider:
|
||||
|
||||
- How complex is the support burden for your feature?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue