There was a lot of copy-pasta code between the finder and pr status. After
some investigation it was clear that the prSelectorForCurrentBranch code
was really just a duplicate of the finder's code without actually making
the API call for the PR. Since the ParsePRRefs helper had already
extracted much of the logic for determining a PR's head ref branch, I was
able to reuse it in gh pr status with a small refactor.
A recent refactor caused the API for ReadBranchConfig to change, resulting
in changes for its consumers. Additionally, there was a large refactor of
the tests associated with ReadBranchConfig and its consumers to gain
confidence in this refactor. This commit attempts to resolve the
conflicts between the refactor and this effort as well as massage the
changes introduced here to reflect the refactor.
The refactor PR can be found here: https://github.com/cli/cli/pull/10197
I'll note that there are still a few failing tests in status_test.go. I
haven't had a chance to fully grok while they are failing, yet, and
suspect that some insights from the original PR author may be helpful
here.
Full disclaimer: I haven't verified any of this is working locally yet.
My primary motivation is to get these new changes working together in a
manner that unblocks further iteration on this effort.
* trunk: (79 commits)
Enhance help docs on ext upgrade notices
chore: fix some function names in comment
Expand docs on cleaning extension update dir
Simplifying cleanExtensionUpdateDir logic
Separate logic for checking updates
Capture greater detail on updaterEnabled
Restore old error functionality of prSelectorForCurrentBranch
Change error handling on ReadBranchConfig to respect git Exit Codes
fix: add back colon that I removed
fix: actually read how MaxFunc work and simplify the code
fix: padded display
Collapse dryrun checks in ext bin upgrade
Bump github.com/mattn/go-colorable from 0.1.13 to 0.1.14
Rename test user in tests
Change pr number in test
Surface and handle error from ReadBranchConfig in parseCurrentBranch
Directly stub headBranchConfig in Test_tryDetermineTrackingRef
Refactor error handling in ReadBranchConfig to avoid panic
Refine error handling of ReadBranchConfig
Add test for empty BranchConfig in prSelectorForCurrentBranch
...
Before this refactor, the errors emitted by ghrepo.FromURL and
rem.FindName() were suppressed. It isn't clear whether this was
intentional or not, but we've made the decision here to maintain the
original error behavior while still refactoring the return values for more
clarity. I've left a comment at each error handling block to explain this
decision.
Additionally, I've added the necessary git command stubs to the other
tests in status_test.go so that the tests are now passing.
Replace the git config argument in prSelectorForCurrentBranch with
the branchConfig it was used to fetch. The tests needed to be refactored
accordingly to support this change to the prSelectorForCurrentBranch API.
In addition, I've moved the test to a table test format so I can expand
the test coverage in the next commit.
When using a push.default = current triangular workflow, apart from
using @{push} to determine the remote branch name, we should also follow
the
1. branch.<name>.pushRemote
2. remote.pushDefault
3. branch.<name>.remote
...list to determine which remote Git pushes to.
When push.default is not 'upstream' / 'tracking' (or 'nothing'), we can
expect local and remote branch names to be the same and solely rely on
@{push} or RemoteURL.
This fixes the wrong error message 'no pull requests found for branch
"<target branch>"' when the local branch is not pushed in the
push.default = simple / current and upstream = <target branch> setup.
When using a push.default = current central workflow [1], we should use
@{push} instead to locate the remote branch.
In fact, @{push} covers most cases in push.default = upstream too. The
branch.<name>.merge is probably only needed when using RemoteURL and
different remote / local branch names.
[1] https://github.com/tpope/vim-fugitive/issues/1172#issuecomment-522301607
If the base branch has no minimum approval requirements, show "N Approved"
reviews. Otherwise, show "N/X Approved".
Co-authored-by: Mislav Marohnić <mislav@github.com>
