* feat: add ability to copy one-time OAuth code while authenticating
Signed-off-by: Andrey <andrekabatareika@gmail.com>
* fix(docs): wrong example for gh auth refresh
* chore(authflow): update message to include one-time code to it
Co-authored-by: Kynan Ware <47394200+BagToad@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore(authflow): improve message when copied one-time code
Co-authored-by: Kynan Ware <47394200+BagToad@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore(authflow): don't early return error when could not copy OAuth code
Co-authored-by: Kynan Ware <47394200+BagToad@users.noreply.github.com>
* refactor(authflow): make code for working with OAuth code more readable
* Adjust language in `gh auth` help for clipboard
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrey <andrekabatareika@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kynan Ware <47394200+BagToad@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs(release create): distinguish difference between '--generate-notes' and '--notes-from-tag'
Signed-off-by: Andrey <andrekabatareika@gmail.com>
* Clarify release notes behavior for unannotated tags
Updated help text to specify that if a git tag is not annotated, the release notes will use the commit message instead of the tag annotation.
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrey <andrekabatareika@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kynan Ware <47394200+BagToad@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: add --force flag to run cancel command
Signed-off-by: Andrey <andrekabatareika@gmail.com>
* docs: use less prescriptive docs for --force flag
Co-authored-by: Kynan Ware <47394200+BagToad@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore: remove short flag
Signed-off-by: Andrey <andrekabatareika@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrey <andrekabatareika@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kynan Ware <47394200+BagToad@users.noreply.github.com>
These changes enhance the existing `gh issue view` experience by listing v2 projects in interactive and non-interactive forms.
Additionally, the tests have been enhanced to use a more standard `httpStubs` approach from other tests.
This commit moves the `gh pr create` tab completion test closer to the logic rather than the commands that use it.
This should ensure that any command or flag that lists reviewers will present teams and users as expected.
This commit enhances the following scenarios to include organization teams as pull request reviewers:
1. Interactive `gh pr create` during additional metadata
2. Tab completing `gh pr create --reviewer`
3. Tab completing `gh pr edit --add-reviewer`
4. Tab completing `gh pr edit --remove-reviewer`
Additionally, a new `gh pr create` test case for ensuring that teams show up within interactive prompts has been added.
Introduces a new help topic explaining how to use exclusion qualifiers in GitHub search syntax with gh commands, including platform-specific instructions for Unix-like systems and PowerShell. Provides links to relevant documentation for further reference.
Co-Authored-By: Sid <41968447+sukhpreet-s@users.noreply.github.com>
Added test cases to verify that teams are fetched when reviewers include teams and not fetched when only users are specified. This ensures correct behavior when requesting reviews from users and teams during pull request creation.
Updated the logic for fetching team reviewers in PR edit and create flows. In `pr edit`, team reviewers are always fetched for consistency with existing behavior, with a note to potentially align with `pr create` logic in the future. In `pr create`, team reviewers are now only fetched if a reviewer contains a slash, aligning with behavior before the regression.
