This adds `arhived:false` to the underlying search queries.
Additionally, the query approach was rearranged so that the query
strings are passed as GraphQL variables rather than being interpolated
directly into the GraphQL query string.
Co-authored-by: Mislav Marohnić <mislav@github.com>
* Use plural linking verb
While it looks like you could use "there's" informally, grammatically, it should be "are" since "commits" is plural.
<https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/grammar/british-grammar/there-is-there-s-and-there-are>
* Omit "the"
I created a remote called "github" and got this prompt:
> Would you like to push commits from the current branch to the "github"?
Normally, the default name "origin" doesn't sound bad in that prompt,
but using the name "github" made the prompt sound like something wasn't
right to my American English-speaking ears.
Here are a few options. Yes, I know English grammar sucks, to put it
mildly. But, hopefully, the following options and explanations make
sense.
Get rid of "the". This is the option I went with. "github" acts as a
proper noun, so no determiner is needed. If you substitute your own
name for "github" in the original prompt above, you get the same effect:
> Would you like to push commits from the current branch to "github"?
Add the implicit word "remote". "github" now acts as an adjective and
"the" refers to "remote":
> Would you like to push commits from the current branch to the "github" remote?
Or, combine the two. This last option relies on the fact that
instructions and manuals often omit definite articles because most
articles are definite. See the [zero-marking][2] article on Wikipedia.
The original prompt already does this by omitting "the" before the word
"commits":
> Would you like to push commits from the current branch to "github" remote?
Reference:
[1]: http://writing.umn.edu/sws/quickhelp/grammar/articlesproper.html
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-marking_in_English
The `issue comment` command would perform a `filepath.Base()` on the
value of EDITOR and use the result for launching the editor, which is
undesireable for both functional and display purposes:
- For functional purposes, always shellsplit the value of GH_EDITOR or
EDITOR before we shell out to that process;
- For display purposes, extract the basename only after shellsplitting.
This removes the explicit check for the gist owner, speeding up the gist
deletion due to fewer API requests, but resulting in a more vague error
message in case the gist is "not found".
